Sentencing and Incarceration June 29, 2019 – Posted in: Buy Cheap Essay Online
What is the substantive information you will include in your paper?
What is the minority you will focus on? What are the rates/statistics?
Who determines a sentence? What is the decision making point- and the minority group represented. Police do not sentence a defendant.
Due: In sections as posted on Blackboard
Assignment: From at least three (3) reputable sources –of which 1 (one) credible source must be from the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article, and 1 (one) source must be from a credible government/professional organization – Students are expected to research information related to one of the following criminal justice decision-making points:
Students are expected to:
Summarize the rates, of the selected decision-making point, based on socio-economic class or race and ethnicity;
Summarize steps taken (at a minimum, two existing programs, initiatives, and/or policies) that attempt to remedy disproportionate minority representation;
Assess the efficacy of the present policies and practices and provide their rationale for deeming them ineffective/effective; and
Suggest practices/policies that they predict would decrease disproportionate representation of minorities at the research.
Format: The document, submitted to Safe Assign, must be type-written, specifically double-spaced, one inch margins, and 12 point font. There is NO page minimum; rather students should be concerned with their comprehensive/exhaustive coverage of the topic area.
Students must use APA format for citations and references; students must cite sources in the body of the report (in-text citations) and include a list of sources at the end of the report (reference page).
Submission: Prior to the submission date students are required to use Safe Assignment. The acceptable Safe Assign score will be determined by the individual instructor/professor.
Grading: Students will be graded on the completeness of the assignment as well as the quality and thoroughness of their paper. Failure to follow instructions can result in point deductions.
NOTE: By providing the required items students can achieve a “C’ grade on this assignment. Students wanting to acquire a higher grade will need to appropriately embellish their papers. They can provide notably extra detail on the above information areas (please see the Rubric).
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate to the instructor/professor that students are competent in each of these General Education objectives:
Local and Global Diversity:
Researching and assessing the topic of either police arrests, the use of plea bargains, or incarceration within diverse population groups.
Professional and Personal Ethics:
Researching a specified CJS Decision-Making point and evaluating the efficacy of present polices/practices to decrease disproportionate minority representation at targeted decision-making points in the CJS.
Critical Analysis and Reasoning:
Predicting practices/policies that would decrease disproportionate representation of minorities are targeted decision-making points in the Criminal Justice System.
Identifying and evaluating appropriate resources for research as well as effectively incorporate the information using APA format for in text citations and references
Written and Oral Communication:
Writing coherently and communicating ideas related to data, practices, and efficacy of one of three present CJS practices.
Furthermore, this assignment will assist students in obtaining the following course objectives:
(CCO#6) Analyze the structure and role of law enforcement in a diverse society;
(CCO#8) Describe the factors that influence sentencing;
(CCO#10) Summarize the historical development of institutional corrections and current issues related to the inmate population, including its relationship to global incarceration rates; and
(CCO#14) Correlate the discretion that is exerted throughout the criminal justice process with the importance of ethical decision-making at each step.
Audience: The audience of this project is the instructor/professor; assume that he/she is un-informed, an outsider to the field of criminal justice. He/she is also not psychic, students need to make sure the information they present is self-explanatory and would not require additional clarification.